Request: Add Reply-To Header

[Youness Alaoui]

Hi,
I use mutt over a terminal as mail client, and it doesn't recognize the list, so I need to do a reply-all, which I am really not used to doing.. 
I prefer the reply-to header as this makes it much easier.. for me at least...
we could try to vote on who wants it and who doesn't (or don't care) then decide.. I would vote for having a reply-to header.

Subject mangling would be nice, helps me see what was sent where, but it's not necessary at all, so I really don't mind it the way it is.

KaKaRoTo

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:10:04PM -0500, Ethan Blanton wrote:
> Tom Hennigan spake unto us the following wisdom:
> > Unless people really object, could an admin add a Reply-To header to  
> > mails sent by the mailing list?
> 
> Here are the standard arguments, presented reasonably well:
> 
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> 
> I share Luke's feelings; I really don't like reply-to, and I use a
> mailer which doesn't suck.  However, I am not the primary intended
> user of this mailing list, so I'm not going to spend a lot of time
> debating it if most of you *do* use mailers that suck and really want
> this.
> 
> Ethan
> 
> -- 
> The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws [that have no remedy
> for evils].  They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor
> determined to commit crimes.
> 		-- Cesare Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishments", 1764



> _______________________________________________
> Openim mailing list
> Openim at imfreedom.org
> http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openim